Sam and I were very excited to finally see “Hamlet 2.” We were in Edmond for the day, an hour’s journey from Stillwater, and I couldn’t have been happier. The previews, the reviews! All pointed to a positive film experience. Too bad.
“Hamlet 2″ is not that good at all. There are a few spots that I laughed out loud at. Comedy of the year, though? Comedy isn’t even the genre, really. The movie itself is confused as to where it would sit in a video store. The plot follows poor teacher Dana Marshz (Steve Coogan) as his life falls apart. I suppose we are supposed to laugh at him as his life gets worse and worse. But things just aren’t that funny.
What upsets me most is what upsets me most about most movies (most mosts award!). This could have been a lot better. First and formost, the trailer is horribly guilty of the “show only the funny parts” crime. More unfortunate is that these funny bits are better in the trailer when taken out of context of the film. There are several ways this movie could have been better.
The trailer could have shown a more honest portrayal of what we were getting ourselves into. It’s really not the madcap comedy I felt we were being shown. It’s trying to be witty and self-aware, and Juno-ish. It wasn’t, but preparation for that experience might have gotten the right people in the theater.
Steve Coogan’s character was confusing to me. I’m not sure if he really knew what was going on in the world around him. He played so over the top a person, I could never tell if he was serious or not. If he really cared about what was going on or if he just had no idea what was happening. He wasn’t a person – more a ghost throughout the film.
Editing was a big problem, too. Several sequences could have easily been omitted or clipped down. There is a scene in which Coogan goes (drunk) to buy booze on his roller skates (a funny bit, yes). It seemed intended to just be a funny spot. It added nothing to the story, character, or movie as a whole and was just more crap to sit through. I don’t think it would have been terribly better, but I would argue tighter editing might have made it more watchable.
Finally, either the direction or the writing needed to be far, far more mature. What I saw was a good idea for a movie. It never decided if it was a madcap comedy or a story of following through with your dreams. There were subplots detailing both. Which was it? Neither.
In the end, we are happy. Because it’s over. Just not that great a movie. Skip it, I tell you. Skip it.

